Court rejecting as unfounded the

Athe public authorities through administrative litigation with the exception of those that concern the relations with the Parliament as well as the command acts of a military nature. Also the provisions of art. paragraph regarding the right to a fair trial from the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. . Examining the exception of unconstitutionality the Court finds that in the present case the dissatisfaction of the author of the exception starts from the fact that a person injured in his rights or legitimate interests by an administrativefiscal act cannot challenge this act before the administrative court but only the decision issued in the administrative appeal settlement procedure.


Or in the opinion of the author of the Country Email List exception of unconstitutionality the fiscal administrative act that directly produces legal effects on those to whom it is addressed effects that the issuing body of the act has in mind is the initial act and not the decision given by the issuing body at the prior complaint and thus considers that the provisions of art. para. and from Government Ordinance no. on the Fiscal Procedure Code are unconstitutional.




The criticized provisions were also the object of the constitutional review in relation to similar reasons and constitutional provisions theexception of unconstitutionality in which sense they are for example Decision no. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of March Decision no. of December published in Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of February Decision no. of March published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of May Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of December . . The Court ruled that.